ULTRAGIRL (Coming Soon)

[Rye]

Hey guys, here are a few previews of a new movie I just wrapped up which includes a parody of one of my favorite scenes from the JLU cartoon featuring SG vs Galatea



Let me know if there are any questions

[braces17]

My God Rye! Appears you've done it again. Here's an early pat on the back to you and everyone associated with your work. I'm positive it will be another blockbuster!!

[rayman]

Woo Hoo!..Sign me up Rye
Looks great....

[valugi]

Very good, any release date?

[dlo005]

beautiful actress...may have to add this vid to my collection of quality rye productions

[mrestfla]

Pantyhose......UGLY pantyhose at that!

[Heroine Addict]

I'll try to phrase this in as gentlemanly a way as possible, but is this PG-13 or will we be seeing a bit more of your lovely model?

Apologies for lowering the tone.

[EvilBilly]

Great work on the costume!

[tallyho]

Great work on the costume!

I dunno...not sold on the costume. Too much red? Or maybe its just the lack of a logo? Can't put my finger on it but it just doesn't work for me.

That said what's IN the costume gets 11/10 ! She looks gorgeous and from the stills you have gone for another quality actress.
Hope we see lots more of her.

[Tuathal]

Great work on the costume!

I also love the costume, Great job!

[Supergirl is mine]

This looks awesome Rye, love the costume and the Ultragirl actress is absolutely gorgeous!

[powerman]

Great job Rye, a bit of variety with the heroine but the usual high standard of production.

[avenger]

damn those hose!

[Mr. X]

Awesome costume.

[juzjoe4]

I like the hose.

[Gomur]

Love the arms and shoulders on the villainess! I just have a weakness for fit, toned women.

[rayman]

Love the arms and shoulders on the villainess! I just have a weakness for fit, toned women.

Me too!
The villaness looks smoking hot to me, I hope Ultragirl gets to give her a work out hehe!

[xxxwarriorxxx]

Please for the love of God tell me there is a chloroform and OTS scene

[teotwawki]

I Like the costume as well as the model within it.

[ranger87]

God, this girl looks hot. I can't wait!

[Rye]

Thanks guys! This was a really fun movie to shoot and I can't wait to work with Hollie again. We got to spend some time chatting over the course of the shoot, she had a lot of interesting stories to share with me. She is also a true sci-fi and comic fan... Some people say they are, or even think they are, but wow she is the real deal!

To answer a few questions,
- This is a PG13 movie... however UltraGirl doesn't make it out of this one.
- No chloro or OTS. It just didn't fit the overall theme of the villains she was fighting.
- No release date yet but it will be done this month for sure.

[Blx]

Can there be a nostril removal scene since there is no chloroform?

A what?

[SGWriter]

Hey guys, here are a few previews of a new movie I just wrapped up which includes a parody of one of my favorite scenes from the JLU cartoon featuring SG vs Galatea

Nice! That has my interest peaked right there.

Great looking actresses and costume for Ultra-Girl Rye.

[Rye]

Can there be a nostril removal scene since there is no chloroform?

Uhh... are you ok?

[DrObiCaffi]

I think her legs look super hot in the hose! I am tempted! :-p

[Gomur]

I think her legs look super hot in the hose! I am tempted! :-p

Always a touchy topic with the stockings. Being a bare leg guy, I wish there was less sheen. But I know many feel just the opposite.

[Heroine Addict]

I understand that the Ultragirl and Skyfire models only do the PG-13 stuff and that's fair enough. However, is there any chance you could do an adult video featuring the types of costumes* worn by UG and SF?


*A red and blue Supergirl look with added mask and tights.

[ranger87]

I understand that the Ultragirl and Skyfire models only do the PG-13 stuff and that's fair enough. However, is there any chance you could do an adult video featuring the types of costumes* worn by UG and SF?


*A red and blue Supergirl look with added mask and tights.

I actually think that I support this decision...I REALLY like that idea.

[Rye]

Heroine Addict-
The short answer is yes, and I'm sure one of those 2 heroines will get featured in a PH movie this year.

[Heroine Addict]

Heroine Addict-
The short answer is yes, and I'm sure one of those 2 heroines will get featured in a PH movie this year.

[Mr Burns tent hands]
Excellent news. Thanks.

[kingles]

Can there be a nostril removal scene since there is no chloroform?

You realize that nostrils can be used for things other than breathing in chloroform right?
Like air for instance. Plus these villains are not the kind of villains who would give a heroine a nostrilectomy...that's just too vile.

[staggerlee]

agh, when is this coming out?!?!?! I want to purchase immediately!

[rayman]

agh, when is this coming out?!?!?! I want to purchase immediately!

Trailer is up at SHGMedia

[GMan2]

Really----why not just make cartoons? Any superheroine peril movie without any nudity just seems silly.

Another who keeps equating peril to porn.

[ranger87]

Nudity does not equal porn....try again, philosopher.

por·nog·ra·phy

/pôrˈnägrəfē/



Noun


Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.

Nudity implies the display of sexual organs. Anything with nudity CAN be construed as porn. Try again. And try to post once without purposefully insulting or degrading a producer, their material, or someone who's been contributing to this forum longer than you, and tries to do in constructively.

[Viraleus]

Geez, we're going to need lawyers in here pretty soon to argue sides!

"Sexual organs is to be interpreted as reproductive organs, henceforth the penis and the vah-ja-na! Ergo, the unveiling of da boobies in videos will not be classified as pa-rn!"

"And I wasn't wearing a tie!"

[Rye]

Just a quick update,

Release will likely be around the 31st and I will try and have a full trailer asap.

[sugarcoater]

For the sake of the debate, how about the intent of the nudity? After all, the statue of David is not a pornographic statue, is it? The ESPN body issue has naked athletes in various poses, but I don't think ESPN or the stores that sell the magazine would consider it porn. Perhaps that's what ranger87 is getting at: the idea of "explicit description or display" of the sexual organs. This would fit with packer64's point that nudity by itself is not necessarily porn.
In short, you're both right as far as I can see it.

[braces17]

RYE - Have you thought about offering an HD still shot package of your various works? Screen/Vid caps are cool but I think stills would be a simple/cheap way to spread your product. I, for one, would most probably purchase both the HD flic and a stills package.

[Cornfed]

I too would purchase still shots. Great idea.

[superheroinebabes]

Costume and superwoman actress combo are REALLY LOOKING GOOD+

[Dr.Morticus]

Beautiful actress Rye, though I am more a fan of Punished Heroines, I find it difficult not to click buy at times! I may have to give this one a go.

[Rye]

Ultra Girl should be available some time today over at www.SHG-media.com

Sorry for the delays but it should be more than worth the wait!

[ranger87]

Nudity does not equal porn....try again, philosopher.

por·nog·ra·phy

/pôrˈnägrəfē/



Noun


Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.

Nudity implies the display of sexual organs. Anything with nudity CAN be construed as porn. Try again. And try to post once without purposefully insulting or degrading a producer, their material, or someone who's been contributing to this forum longer than you, and tries to do in constructively.

Bad movies should be construed to be porn, as well.

Wow...took you almost a month to come up with that, huh? Good job. By your definitions, Kick-Ass, due to it's violence, can be construed as porn. And Gigli is obviously porn as well, as it is a notoriously bad movie.

I don't have to respond, but honestly it's just super fun. In your relatively short time on the forum here, you've already painted yourself as a troll to anyone and everyone. People have the ability to look up your entire post history. Not surprisingly, most, if not all, of your posts are trolling producers, never saying a positive thing or using constructive criticism. And while you've harassed numerous producers, you seem to take a special joy in posting disruptive, derogatory, or negative comments in Rye's in particular.

Nobody will take you seriously or respect your opinion one way or the other on this forum, because of your history of harassment of producers. Even if you were to turn that trend around today, nobody would take what you have to say seriously.

Best wishes, and good luck on your next video. I look forward to links showing us all what you have made.

[sugarcoater]

Well since packers64 is making presumptions, I have to presume--based on this quote: "From what I've read of your guy's comments" that if I am to be labeled as a "virgin with zero female contact" then packers64 must be a high school drop out based on such poor grammatical skills.
I suppose the ad hominem argument was the next step, as no logical argument and no evidence of packers64's work has yet to be revealed here. Seriously, as you hijacked this thread, how about giving us a link to your work and adding some ethos to your argument? But to whine about the whining is hypocritical at best. This thread has been amusing to follow, but seriously, how about putting an end to the entire debate and put links to either your work or videos you find to be the best-of-the-best or that fit your definition and the discussion could become legitimate. As it is, all we have are baseless claims and matters of taste/perspective. It's silly to continue with it any further without any new material.

[ranger87]

Well since packers64 is making presumptions, I have to presume--based on this quote: "From what I've read of your guy's comments" that if I am to be labeled as a "virgin with zero female contact" then packers64 must be a high school drop out based on such poor grammatical skills.
I suppose the ad hominem argument was the next step, as no logical argument and no evidence of packers64's work has yet to be revealed here. Seriously, as you hijacked this thread, how about giving us a link to your work and adding some ethos to your argument? But to whine about the whining is hypocritical at best. This thread has been amusing to follow, but seriously, how about putting an end to the entire debate and put links to either your work or videos you find to be the best-of-the-best or that fit your definition and the discussion could become legitimate. As it is, all we have are baseless claims and matters of taste/perspective. It's silly to continue with it any further without any new material.

Well put, and agreed. I would like to know what Packer considers "constructive criticism". But the point has been made. He doesn't back up what he says, and no producer or customer on this forum while take his comments seriously. There is no point in continuing this. With this video released and done with, this thread should be put to bed.

[rayman]

Nudity does not equal porn....try again, philosopher.

por·nog·ra·phy

/pôrˈnägrəfē/



Noun


Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.

Nudity implies the display of sexual organs. Anything with nudity CAN be construed as porn. Try again. And try to post once without purposefully insulting or degrading a producer, their material, or someone who's been contributing to this forum longer than you, and tries to do in constructively.

Bad movies should be construed to be porn, as well.

Wow...took you almost a month to come up with that, huh? Good job. By your definitions, Kick-Ass, due to it's violence, can be construed as porn. And Gigli is obviously porn as well, as it is a notoriously bad movie.

I don't have to respond, but honestly it's just super fun. In your relatively short time on the forum here, you've already painted yourself as a troll to anyone and everyone. People have the ability to look up your entire post history. Not surprisingly, most, if not all, of your posts are trolling producers, never saying a positive thing or using constructive criticism. And while you've harassed numerous producers, you seem to take a special joy in posting disruptive, derogatory, or negative comments in Rye's in particular.

Nobody will take you seriously or respect your opinion one way or the other on this forum, because of your history of harassment of producers. Even if you were to turn that trend around today, nobody would take what you have to say seriously.

Best wishes, and good luck on your next video. I look forward to links showing us all what you have made.

I don't care whether any of the fan boys on this thread respect my opinions. From what I've read of your guy's comments I am convinced that most if not all of you are virgins with zero female relationships. I no longer do videos......if you had the ability to comprehend my post regarding that you would have realized that. I am sure that is way too much to expect though. It is humorous that you boys cannot understand or accept any constructive criticism......if anyone disagrees with you you tend to whine and cry about it. Evidence of stunted maturity.

Thought provoking and often laughter inducing thread going on here but seriously...What is a virgin?
Insulting forum members en masse is not exactly mature.