Page 1 of 1
Super Man
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 11:52 am
by daphne
Who went and saw the new Super Man last night, Man of Steel? What did you think?
Re: Super Man
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:55 pm
by DrObiCaffi
I saw it and hated it. BOOOOOOOOO!
Re: Super Man
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:19 pm
by Mr. X
It was OK. Some cool new ideas. I was entertained by it. No real character development. Lois Lane is pretty lack luster.
Re: Super Man
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:04 pm
by tallyho
Mr. X wrote:It was OK. Some cool new ideas. I was entertained by it. No real character development. Lois Lane is pretty lack luster.
What, more Lois Lame?

Re: Super Man
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 10:19 pm
by Mr. X
tallyho wrote:Mr. X wrote:It was OK. Some cool new ideas. I was entertained by it. No real character development. Lois Lane is pretty lack luster.
What, more Lois Lame?

Well if one views this movie as a sort of common female movie then it follows Lois would be lack luster and Superman is a hunk. Like movies where the hero is some common guy and the female is some hot babe (Austin Powers for example). So yeah I think it was aiming at that common girl gets the hunk scenario kind of like a romance novel. Only they don't explore that all that much. The Superman Returns Lois was horrible. I kept rooting for Lex Luthor.
Re: Super Man
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:55 pm
by daphne
I have to go see it still, debating if I want to spend the money, so you guys weren't really into the chick??
Whats your favorite superman movie??
Re: Super Man
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:23 pm
by DrObiCaffi
superman and Superman 2. Just the CREDITS In the original movie gave you chills. Much more "magic" in those films then in the rest. Seems to me they could have rebooted it with a different kind of "magic" This was just a FORCED story to try to make Superman more vulnerable as a character emotionally and it took away from the basic story of superman. Thumbs down to me.
Re: Super Man
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:28 pm
by Mr. X
DrObiCaffi wrote:superman and Superman 2. Just the CREDITS In the original movie gave you chills. Much more "magic" in those films then in the rest. Seems to me they could have rebooted it with a different kind of "magic" This was just a FORCED story to try to make Superman more vulnerable as a character emotionally and it took away from the basic story of superman. Thumbs down to me.
Yes I 100% agree that this wasn't "Superman". This was just a hunky guy with super powers. No ideals. No nobility. No greatness. For example they flash back on his life but his father doesn't teach him anything grand. That whole sequence where Superman in #1 was flying around saving people from the earth quake was incredible. In this movie Superman causes more damage to smallville and New York than the villains. No wisdom from Jor El, nothing. So yeah its action and has some nice fight scenes. That's all. But as far as the idea of Superman... its gone. Another franchise like Star Trek murdered in its sleep.
Re: Super Man
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:59 pm
by daphne
REally?? That Sucks!! Apparently they are just trying to sell the action in the movie instead of the story, which for me ruins it! Thats too bad :(
Re: Super Man
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:56 pm
by Mr. X
well its not that bad of a movie. Just its not superman really.
Re: Super Man
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:50 pm
by daphne
gotcha!