The Ultimate Superheroines Forum

Primal's Disgraced Superheroines is gone from Cllips4sale. Their other superheroine clips are still up in their other stores on Clips4sale Primal's Savage Tales, Primal's Custom Videos, and Primal's SUPERHEROINE SHAME, but all their superheroine clips from their largest and most updated store, Primal's Disgraced Superheroines, are gone. Does anyone know why? I know for the past few years they've only put out a small amount of superheroine content, but It seems strange that they still have their other superheroine stores up while they took down their main superheroine store.

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

Victor wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

What was the content? For example forced sex could get them pulled.
Also could it be they folded that content into the other stores?

Victor wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

All this means is that C4S hasn't found other violating clips to kill yet. But they will eventually and anything that breaks TOS will be gone.

C4S recently killed all 'underwater' content. And as they increase their AI detection system more and more content will disappear from their site

Mr. X and SHL,

That makes sense. Primal still has a lot of their Disgraced Superheroine clips on LoyalFans.

SHL wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Victor wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

All this means is that C4S hasn't found other violating clips to kill yet. But they will eventually and anything that breaks TOS will be gone.

C4S recently killed all 'underwater' content. And as they increase their AI detection system more and more content will disappear from their site

They were also killing off chloroform content and NC content. Yes they just haven't wiped out those channels yet.

The boner police are coming for your hard-on.

We have been going through this for the last 14 months. they killed chloroform but then it was hypno, cuntbusting, DiD, HOM, and then non-consent stuff.
We have literally (no kidding) had over 4,000 clips deleted ranging from 2004 - 2025

They are also targeting legacy content asking for unexpired ID's even though the ID's were not expired when we took them!
but they are well expired now

Which means having to delete clips with models who have retired, passed away, or in prison (yeah there are former models in jail)

Thats why we (and a few other producers) have shifted to Loyal fans which is owned by Neil (the former owner of C4S)
where while still strict its not anywhere as bad as what C4S is now doing

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

SHL wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Victor wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

All this means is that C4S hasn't found other violating clips to kill yet. But they will eventually and anything that breaks TOS will be gone.

C4S recently killed all 'underwater' content. And as they increase their AI detection system more and more content will disappear from their site

They were also killing off chloroform content and NC content. Yes they just haven't wiped out those channels yet.

I know. Granted, NC content hasn't been allowed there for over 15 years (maybe ever?) as it was always against TOS. I am pretty sure chloroform was also against TOS, it just didn't have a fine tooth comb then as it does now.

The only thing thats really changed is the use of AI detection, which has allowed them to moderate and remove content more easily. I know there are trigger words that can get a clipped remove even if it doesnt break TOS.

IMO though, no one should be using c4s as their main platform. Why pay them 40 percent of your sales? Fucking robbery

SHL wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Victor wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

All this means is that C4S hasn't found other violating clips to kill yet. But they will eventually and anything that breaks TOS will be gone.

C4S recently killed all 'underwater' content. And as they increase their AI detection system more and more content will disappear from their site

Does underwater mean something other than filming people in a pool? I don't even understand that? What is the problem? So, like they would ban Aquaman the movie from being hosted.

vnv7272 wrote: ↑

10 months ago

SHL wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Victor wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

I don't think either would be the reason in this case since they left all their other clips up.

All this means is that C4S hasn't found other violating clips to kill yet. But they will eventually and anything that breaks TOS will be gone.

C4S recently killed all 'underwater' content. And as they increase their AI detection system more and more content will disappear from their site

Does underwater mean something other than filming people in a pool? I don't even understand that? What is the problem? So, like they would ban Aquaman the movie from being hosted.

May have been drowning stuff. They apparently don't like snuff, drugged, NC, bestiality, choking etc.

C4S has been targeting wrestling content as well.

Meanwhile, lil Tay can post content she shot when she was 17 and VISA and MC are here for it.

I've also noticed AI generators (browser-based) have oppressive censorship to the point of not worth using. Since I've been unsuccessful in making any of the offline AI generators work on my Intel Mac, I've tried out a dozen online generators. The censorship is sporadic at times, sometimes content is flagged and other times the same content is allowed. I assume that's because the filters just can't catch every violation of the ToS? It's very tricky wording the prompts just right to avoid the filters. Extreme violence seems to be acceptable with some of them but anything involving nudity or even a hint of sexual content gets flagged before it finishes generating. Blood and gore is ok but sex is bad, what a messed up ass-backwards world we live in. I found it very difficult getting SHIP passed the filters, at least anything worth generating.

HiDef wrote: ↑

10 months ago

I've also noticed AI generators (browser-based) have oppressive censorship to the point of not worth using. Since I've been unsuccessful in making any of the offline AI generators work on my Intel Mac, I've tried out a dozen online generators. The censorship is sporadic at times, sometimes content is flagged and other times the same content is allowed. I assume that's because the filters just can't catch every violation of the ToS? It's very tricky wording the prompts just right to avoid the filters. Extreme violence seems to be acceptable with some of them but anything involving nudity or even a hint of sexual content gets flagged before it finishes generating. Blood and gore is ok but sex is bad, what a messed up ass-backwards world we live in. I found it very difficult getting SHIP passed the filters, at least anything worth generating.

Trouble is off line requires NVidia. Does not support intel cards. So you can't even buy a mini pc. If you go to civitai website they do offer an online video maker that maybe NSFW.

They replied to someone who asked about it on X, Primal's account said they decided to move their content to sheer.

Js78pf wrote: ↑

10 months ago

They replied to someone who asked about it on X, Primal's account said they decided to move their content to sheer.

That's a shame. I just checked out their page on Sheer. A subscription is required in order to view their clips.
I'm not sure if it's extra money to purchase and permanently download any of their movies.

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

HiDef wrote: ↑

10 months ago

I've also noticed AI generators (browser-based) have oppressive censorship to the point of not worth using. Since I've been unsuccessful in making any of the offline AI generators work on my Intel Mac, I've tried out a dozen online generators. The censorship is sporadic at times, sometimes content is flagged and other times the same content is allowed. I assume that's because the filters just can't catch every violation of the ToS? It's very tricky wording the prompts just right to avoid the filters. Extreme violence seems to be acceptable with some of them but anything involving nudity or even a hint of sexual content gets flagged before it finishes generating. Blood and gore is ok but sex is bad, what a messed up ass-backwards world we live in. I found it very difficult getting SHIP passed the filters, at least anything worth generating.

Trouble is off line requires NVidia. Does not support intel cards. So you can't even buy a mini pc. If you go to civitai website they do offer an online video maker that maybe NSFW.

I believe Apple's M-series processors work as well. I have my eye on a Mac Studio with M4 Max but I'm waiting for the price to come down. This censorship bullshit is neutering my creative process and it's generating all sorts of F-ed up shit because the filters are so restricted. I won't go into full detail but one of my prompts for an image to video described both the heroine and villainess as wearing stiletto boots. It generated a snuff video where the villainess threw the heroine onto a desk, straddled her and stabbed her in the mouth with a stiletto knife with blood spraying like a garden hose. None of that was in my prompt. The filters finally flagged it after a few more generations and it returned my credits. I wonder though, if it may still be credited against me as a violation that could lead to a ban? Sorry folks, I did not save it because I'm not into snuff.

Falleen wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Js78pf wrote: ↑

10 months ago

They replied to someone who asked about it on X, Primal's account said they decided to move their content to sheer.

That's a shame. I just checked out their page on Sheer. A subscription is required in order to view their clips.
I'm not sure if it's extra money to purchase and permanently download any of their movies.

I agree, I like not having to pay a subscription fee and only buying what I want. I'd never even heard of sheer, I would have thought they'd move to ManyVids maybe. It's a shame as I was looking forward to seeing the next part of their "fall of Reign" story whenever they got around to finally releasing it.

There has been a recent push. Some religious whackos went after explicit videogames and won, at least for a time, and that has emboldened every dipshit with a grudge against fapping to put pressure on the payment processors again.

Like every wave of this shit, it will pass in time, and we'll be left with less in the wake of it.

Dogfish wrote: ↑

10 months ago

There has been a recent push. Some religious whackos went after explicit videogames and won, at least for a time, and that has emboldened every dipshit with a grudge against fapping to put pressure on the payment processors again.

Like every wave of this shit, it will pass in time, and we'll be left with less in the wake of it.

Yeah - heard a lot lately about Australia's Collective Shout. From its targets (Steam, etc) I was initially under the impression that it was left-wing feminist stridency, but actually it's a conservative anti-porn group started over 15 years ago. After some success this year lobbying payment processors, it looks like there's a backlash against them now.

Why does Australia have such a stick up its ass about porn, compared to most Western countries? (From what I understand, you can't film fetish and sell it there, which I learned about years ago from Eva of Superhero Project.)

Lets not assume anything.

Another site started blocking me because local laws prohbit viewing.

And I live in a very Blue state

batgirleve wrote: ↑

10 months ago

We have been going through this for the last 14 months. they killed chloroform but then it was hypno, cuntbusting, DiD, HOM, and then non-consent stuff.
We have literally (no kidding) had over 4,000 clips deleted ranging from 2004 - 2025

They are also targeting legacy content asking for unexpired ID's even though the ID's were not expired when we took them!
but they are well expired now

Which means having to delete clips with models who have retired, passed away, or in prison (yeah there are former models in jail)

Thats why we (and a few other producers) have shifted to Loyal fans which is owned by Neil (the former owner of C4S)
where while still strict its not anywhere as bad as what C4S is now doing

hey, if your kink is two people sitting 10 feet across from each other sitting in formal, uncomfortable chairs and staring at the floor, now is your time on C4S.

Mr. X wrote: ↑

10 months ago

Thank the repubs. They're the dumb idiots pushing censorship.Could also be china pressure.

China pressure? What do you mean by that? Just curious.

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

The Republican controlled states are implementing age verification laws which were deemed constitutional by the right-wing Supreme Court. This is a prime example of idiots who are computer illiterate implementing laws to govern its use. Since VPN's easily circumvent age verification, Republicans are suing foreign governments that do not have such laws. Another blatant overreach by US politicians to impose their will on foreign governments. Some right-wing whack-job politician in Utah is calling for a complete ban on all pornography. Financial institutions are pulling the plug on porn in general to protect their own interests. In general those who control the economy make the laws that eventually spread worldwide. China and the BRICS are set to become the world's largest economy surpassing the USA and its allies. They are already throwing their weight around with financial institutions. The BRICS GDP has been steadily growing while the USA and its partners (the G7) have stagnated.

Oppressive laws are usually pushed by those who are repressed in general. A prime example of this is whenever the RNC is in town, gay porn and porn in general searches spike extremely high until they leave town. Sites like Grindr have an unusually high spike within a mile of the RNC convention locations. It's the influx of closeted homosexual Republicans looking to cheat on their wives. This has all been documented with the data to prove it. So the party who claims to be anti-LGTBQ has an unusually high interest gay dating sites.

Recently Pornhub (the world's largest porn site) instituted an age verification prompt which is easily bypassed simply by selecting "I am 18 or older". Pornhub is based in Canada so at the moment is not subjected to US laws but US politicians are pressuring them to comply with US laws.

xxxwarriorxxx wrote: ↑

9 months ago

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

Me too

And as I mentioned I am in a very blue state.

So for everyone saying it is the Republicans it may not be.

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

xxxwarriorxxx wrote: ↑

9 months ago

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

Me too

And as I mentioned I am in a very blue state.

So for everyone saying it is the Republicans it may not be.

Could be the chinese and their requirements.

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

xxxwarriorxxx wrote: ↑

9 months ago

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

Me too

And as I mentioned I am in a very blue state.

So for everyone saying it is the Republicans it may not be.

Yes it is the Republicans, it's laws they have proposed and under Republican majority rule in the all 3 branches of government have passed into law.
What you don't understand is that under these new restrictions, sites that do not have age verification in place would have to implement it to comply with the law. Boundhub tells you the reason why you're blocked right in the popup.

"Sorry!

Your local laws do NOT allow you to view sexually explicit materials without additional age verification. Unfortunately, BoundHub is not yet able to perform this operation."

So they are left with no other choice but to block the entire US population to comply with law. Restrictions that were proposed by and signed into law by Republicans. Democrats need Republican approval to take a piss.

HiDef wrote: ↑

9 months ago

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

xxxwarriorxxx wrote: ↑

9 months ago

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

Me too

And as I mentioned I am in a very blue state.

So for everyone saying it is the Republicans it may not be.

Yes it is the Republicans, it's laws they have proposed and under Republican majority rule in the all 3 branches of government have passed into law.
What you don't understand is that under these new restrictions, sites that do not have age verification in place would have to implement it to comply with the law. Boundhub tells you the reason why you're blocked right in the popup.

"Sorry!

Your local laws do NOT allow you to view sexually explicit materials without additional age verification. Unfortunately, BoundHub is not yet able to perform this operation."

So they are left with no other choice but to block the entire US population to comply with law. Restrictions that were proposed by and signed into law by Republicans. Democrats need Republican approval to take a piss.

If you try to go on Bound Hub's site, you get a white blank page. Sorry Your local laws don't allow access.

So my question is can anyone in any U.S. State still access BoundHub?

Local to me Mass not U.S.

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

HiDef wrote: ↑

9 months ago

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

xxxwarriorxxx wrote: ↑

9 months ago

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

Me too

And as I mentioned I am in a very blue state.

So for everyone saying it is the Republicans it may not be.

Yes it is the Republicans, it's laws they have proposed and under Republican majority rule in the all 3 branches of government have passed into law.
What you don't understand is that under these new restrictions, sites that do not have age verification in place would have to implement it to comply with the law. Boundhub tells you the reason why you're blocked right in the popup.

"Sorry!

Your local laws do NOT allow you to view sexually explicit materials without additional age verification. Unfortunately, BoundHub is not yet able to perform this operation."

So they are left with no other choice but to block the entire US population to comply with law. Restrictions that were proposed by and signed into law by Republicans. Democrats need Republican approval to take a piss.

If you try to go on Bound Hub's site, you get a white blank page. Sorry Your local laws don't allow access.

So my question is can anyone in any U.S. State still access BoundHub?

Local to me Mass not U.S.

Okay, one more time. Look at the quoted text in my post above. It's quoted from Boundhub and gives the reason. Boundhub DOES NOT have age verification so the entire US population no matter where in the US is blocked!

HiDef wrote: ↑

9 months ago

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

HiDef wrote: ↑

9 months ago

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

xxxwarriorxxx wrote: ↑

9 months ago

It’s not even just clips4Sale, Boundhub just blocked me from accessing their site due to “ new state laws.”

What a total joke.

Me too

And as I mentioned I am in a very blue state.

So for everyone saying it is the Republicans it may not be.

Yes it is the Republicans, it's laws they have proposed and under Republican majority rule in the all 3 branches of government have passed into law.
What you don't understand is that under these new restrictions, sites that do not have age verification in place would have to implement it to comply with the law. Boundhub tells you the reason why you're blocked right in the popup.

"Sorry!

Your local laws do NOT allow you to view sexually explicit materials without additional age verification. Unfortunately, BoundHub is not yet able to perform this operation."

So they are left with no other choice but to block the entire US population to comply with law. Restrictions that were proposed by and signed into law by Republicans. Democrats need Republican approval to take a piss.

If you try to go on Bound Hub's site, you get a white blank page. Sorry Your local laws don't allow access.

So my question is can anyone in any U.S. State still access BoundHub?

Local to me Mass not U.S.

Okay, one more time. Look at the quoted text in my post above. It's quoted from Boundhub and gives the reason. Boundhub DOES NOT have age verification so the entire US population no matter where in the US is blocked!

For one more time that is not the message I get now

Sorry! Your local laws do NOT allow you to view this site.

So don't make this a political debate, we agreed as a community to stop doing that.

I’ve gotten the Boundhub message, also. I think the problem is some southern states are implementing much stricter age verification laws (like uploading a drivers license). Boundhub mods probably don’t want to end up in El Salvadorian gulag (or something).

They may just not want to deal with it.

VPN? Be from somewhere that doesn't have the obstructive verification laws and see if that helps.

I'm in the UK, and I get the 'Sorry, you have been blocked' white screen.

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

For one more time that is not the message I get now

Sorry! Your local laws do NOT allow you to view this site.

So don't make this a political debate, we agreed as a community to stop doing that.

I answered your question. There is absolutely nothing in my answer that can be considered political. That is your bullshit argument, a manufactured crisis.

If you're speaking about my previous statements then you need to address those statements. The reason why you chose not to address those statements is because they are 100% true and can be proven. If you don't like the truth then don't ask the questions, it's that simple.

It doesn't matter what you see now when you try to access Boundhub, their reasons why was stated previously. What you're seeing is a canned response generated by your prompt. Boundhub will most likely go offline unless they implement age verification.

I can't believe you still don't understand the reason why you're blocked? I can't make it any simpler.

This will be my last response to you.

HiDef wrote: ↑

9 months ago

Dazzle1 wrote: ↑

9 months ago

For one more time that is not the message I get now

Sorry! Your local laws do NOT allow you to view this site.

So don't make this a political debate, we agreed as a community to stop doing that.

I answered your question. There is absolutely nothing in my answer that can be considered political. That is your bullshit argument, a manufactured crisis.

If you're speaking about my previous statements then you need to address those statements. The reason why you chose not to address those statements is because they are 100% true and can be proven. If you don't like the truth then don't ask the questions, it's that simple.

It doesn't matter what you see now when you try to access Boundhub, their reasons why was stated previously. What you're seeing is a canned response generated by your prompt. Boundhub will most likely go offline unless they implement age verification.

I can't believe you still don't understand the reason why you're blocked? I can't make it any simpler.

This will be my last response to you.

You are one making it political

I asked a simple question and my reasoning is logical.

So someone who want to helpful can respond. You can stop