![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
Let me know if there are any questions
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/01.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/03.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/04.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/11.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/12.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/13.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/14.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/16.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/17.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/18.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/20.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/21.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/22.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/23.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/24.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/25.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/26.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/27.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/28.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/29.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/30.jpg)
![Image](http://www.thebattleforearth.com/hawry/31.jpg)
I dunno...not sold on the costume. Too much red? Or maybe its just the lack of a logo? Can't put my finger on it but it just doesn't work for me.EvilBilly wrote:Great work on the costume!
Me too!Gomur wrote:Love the arms and shoulders on the villainess! I just have a weakness for fit, toned women.
Nice! That has my interest peaked right there.Rye wrote:Hey guys, here are a few previews of a new movie I just wrapped up which includes a parody of one of my favorite scenes from the JLU cartoon featuring SG vs Galatea![]()
I actually think that I support this decision...I REALLY like that idea.Heroine Addict wrote:I understand that the Ultragirl and Skyfire models only do the PG-13 stuff and that's fair enough. However, is there any chance you could do an adult video featuring the types of costumes* worn by UG and SF?
*A red and blue Supergirl look with added mask and tights.
[Mr Burns tent hands]Rye wrote:Heroine Addict-
The short answer is yes, and I'm sure one of those 2 heroines will get featured in a PH movie this year.
You realize that nostrils can be used for things other than breathing in chloroform right?Packers64 wrote:Can there be a nostril removal scene since there is no chloroform?
Packers64 wrote:Really----why not just make cartoons? Any superheroine peril movie without any nudity just seems silly.
por·nog·ra·phyPackers64 wrote:Nudity does not equal porn....try again, philosopher.
Packers64 wrote:Bad movies should be construed to be porn, as well.ranger87 wrote:por·nog·ra·phyPackers64 wrote:Nudity does not equal porn....try again, philosopher.
/pôrˈnägrəfē/
Noun
Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.
Nudity implies the display of sexual organs. Anything with nudity CAN be construed as porn. Try again. And try to post once without purposefully insulting or degrading a producer, their material, or someone who's been contributing to this forum longer than you, and tries to do in constructively.
Well put, and agreed. I would like to know what Packer considers "constructive criticism". But the point has been made. He doesn't back up what he says, and no producer or customer on this forum while take his comments seriously. There is no point in continuing this. With this video released and done with, this thread should be put to bed.sugarcoater wrote:Well since packers64 is making presumptions, I have to presume--based on this quote: "From what I've read of your guy's comments" that if I am to be labeled as a "virgin with zero female contact" then packers64 must be a high school drop out based on such poor grammatical skills.
I suppose the ad hominem argument was the next step, as no logical argument and no evidence of packers64's work has yet to be revealed here. Seriously, as you hijacked this thread, how about giving us a link to your work and adding some ethos to your argument? But to whine about the whining is hypocritical at best. This thread has been amusing to follow, but seriously, how about putting an end to the entire debate and put links to either your work or videos you find to be the best-of-the-best or that fit your definition and the discussion could become legitimate. As it is, all we have are baseless claims and matters of taste/perspective. It's silly to continue with it any further without any new material.
Thought provoking and often laughter inducing thread going on here but seriously...What is a virgin?Packers64 wrote:I don't care whether any of the fan boys on this thread respect my opinions. From what I've read of your guy's comments I am convinced that most if not all of you are virgins with zero female relationships. I no longer do videos......if you had the ability to comprehend my post regarding that you would have realized that. I am sure that is way too much to expect though. It is humorous that you boys cannot understand or accept any constructive criticism......if anyone disagrees with you you tend to whine and cry about it. Evidence of stunted maturity.ranger87 wrote:Packers64 wrote:Bad movies should be construed to be porn, as well.ranger87 wrote:por·nog·ra·phyPackers64 wrote:Nudity does not equal porn....try again, philosopher.
/pôrˈnägrəfē/
Noun
Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.
Nudity implies the display of sexual organs. Anything with nudity CAN be construed as porn. Try again. And try to post once without purposefully insulting or degrading a producer, their material, or someone who's been contributing to this forum longer than you, and tries to do in constructively.
Wow...took you almost a month to come up with that, huh? Good job. By your definitions, Kick-Ass, due to it's violence, can be construed as porn. And Gigli is obviously porn as well, as it is a notoriously bad movie.
I don't have to respond, but honestly it's just super fun. In your relatively short time on the forum here, you've already painted yourself as a troll to anyone and everyone. People have the ability to look up your entire post history. Not surprisingly, most, if not all, of your posts are trolling producers, never saying a positive thing or using constructive criticism. And while you've harassed numerous producers, you seem to take a special joy in posting disruptive, derogatory, or negative comments in Rye's in particular.
Nobody will take you seriously or respect your opinion one way or the other on this forum, because of your history of harassment of producers. Even if you were to turn that trend around today, nobody would take what you have to say seriously.
Best wishes, and good luck on your next video. I look forward to links showing us all what you have made.