I am into female vs female but I have noticed something and wondered why.
So female posters and producers chime in.
Why do almost all the males look like wimps,very ugly and hardly come close to the visual that we get with women?
There are good looking developed males in the industry
Male heroes and villains
- decendingskulls
- Staff Sargeant
- Posts: 157
- Joined: 13 years ago
- Location: New York
- Contact:
Lucky bastards...
Ave atque vale
- Heroine Addict
- Millenium Member
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: 13 years ago
It's probably because it would cost a lot more to hire a male model. As the heroine is the one who almost everyone is looking at, it probably seems unnecessary to pay top dollar for B/G porn stars. Particularly when a friend or crew member will happily wear a plastic cock for free.
The performances are also pretty disturbing (in the wrong way). So many of these villains sound exactly like Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons.
The performances are also pretty disturbing (in the wrong way). So many of these villains sound exactly like Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons.
"A brass unicorn has been catapulted across a London street and impaled an eminent surgeon. Words fail me, gentlemen."
that makes sense, as I said I am more into female/female anyway.Heroine Addict wrote:It's probably because it would cost a lot more to hire a male model. As the heroine is the one who almost everyone is looking at, it probably seems unnecessary to pay top dollar for B/G porn stars. Particularly when a friend or crew member will happily wear a plastic cock for free.
The performances are also pretty disturbing (in the wrong way). So many of these villains sound exactly like Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons.
It was just seeing on the net some very wimpish Batman's and Robins that lead to the question
- Heroine Addict
- Millenium Member
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: 13 years ago
I guess it's only really worth the expense hiring a male model if you're planning on showing penetrative B/G sex. Although that may also limit your choice of female models, most of whom will charge a much higher rate for hardcore B/G.
"A brass unicorn has been catapulted across a London street and impaled an eminent surgeon. Words fail me, gentlemen."
If you are looking at the male villain, you are in the wrong fetish forum!
How strange are the ways of the gods ...........and how cruel.
I am here to help one and all enjoy this site, so if you have any questions or feel you are being trolled please contact me (Hit the 'CONTACT' little speech bubble below my Avatar).
I am here to help one and all enjoy this site, so if you have any questions or feel you are being trolled please contact me (Hit the 'CONTACT' little speech bubble below my Avatar).
-
- Neophyte
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 16 years ago
Rarely post here but figured I might be coming from a less common viewpoint. I'm a bisexual male, so my interests in this fetish are both female superheroines and male superheroes. The gay superhero fetish community is significantly smaller than the market for straight superheroine stuff (at least in terms of the peril genre), but it does exist. What seems to be completely non-existent, though, is male superhero-centric content targeted to straight women. Even in non-fetish content, straight pornography that focuses on the male is very rare (Corbin Fisher is the only name that comes to mind, frankly). I can only guess there is not enough demand, at least not enough to support professional productions. So from a producer's perspective, I don't imagine there's a "value add" to paying for a male actor in straight superheroine videos; you simply wouldn't get enough added interest from women (or cross-over appeal from gay men) to justify the cost.
I suppose an exception might be Lance Hart, who acts in straight superheroine videos and at least breaks the mold of the "wimp" as you say. Even in his case, though, there are mitigating factors: a) he owns/produces his own content at pervout.com, and b) he does gay content as well. For my part, I certainly seek out studios that put in the effort to cast both attractive men and women, and try to support their productions, but I understand straight superheroine videos are where the money is.
I suppose an exception might be Lance Hart, who acts in straight superheroine videos and at least breaks the mold of the "wimp" as you say. Even in his case, though, there are mitigating factors: a) he owns/produces his own content at pervout.com, and b) he does gay content as well. For my part, I certainly seek out studios that put in the effort to cast both attractive men and women, and try to support their productions, but I understand straight superheroine videos are where the money is.
There is one case I can think of where it pays to focus on male models: As the superheroine's love interest/boyfriend. I assume in that case you'd assume the male should be up to the superheroine's standards; she's hot, so she'd probably want someone she was attracted to.
In both Rye's Ultra Girl (with Hollie) and 1984 SG parody (with Cassidy), the heroine had a male love interest. And all the rest of us males envied the heroines' boyfriends! I'd gladly be a heroine's boyfriend!
In both Rye's Ultra Girl (with Hollie) and 1984 SG parody (with Cassidy), the heroine had a male love interest. And all the rest of us males envied the heroines' boyfriends! I'd gladly be a heroine's boyfriend!
Mine was more one of curiosity, since I am in to F/F. but it was just an observation.Dazzle1 wrote:I am into female vs female but I have noticed something and wondered why.
So female posters and producers chime in.
Why do almost all the males look like wimps,very ugly and hardly come close to the visual that we get with women?
There are good looking developed males in the industry