Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Discussions about Movies & TV shows not "Super" related.
Post Reply
User avatar
Maskripper
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 1127
Joined: 9 years ago
Contact:

Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Image

Right now it feels like you have 100 new TV shows every week.
And most of the interesting ones are average (at best) and you forget about them after you finish it.

This one certainly is my highlight of the year (besides "The Last of Us") even though I could only see the 3 episodes that are available so far.
One new episode each Friday.
The setting is excellent, the story is very suspenseful, actors like Rebecca Ferguson(!) and Tim Robbins(!), and an awesome score by Atli Örvarsson.
And the show has a score of 8,4 on IMDB... if you care about it.
Check the storyline there:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14688458/

I hope the show can keep up that level!
Vist my blog and its Youtube channel:
http://www.maskripper.org
https://www.youtube.com/c/MaskripperOrg

Masked women in action! Superheroines, burglars, villainesses are waiting for you...
Mlod
Henchman
Henchman
Posts: 64
Joined: 6 years ago

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

I am very hopeful, I enjoyed the source material (starting with Wool I think) when I read it a decade or so ago.
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Based on Maskripper's recommendation, I am interested to see what this is all about, and how it differs (or hearkens back to)
the many sci-fi tales of post-apocalyptic underground civilizations (and those who escape from them) which have been done in the past.
[Offhand, I can think of Logan's Run, THX-1138, Cleopatra 2525, City of Ember, and the 'bunker' from The 100, but I'm sure there are many more.
I imagine The Island kind of counts, too, right? I think it was underground.)

Will check out the first three episodes tonight if they are accessible, and report back in this post.

Update: Report on first 3 episodes

Having never even watched Lost even once (that's correct. I did not have access to it at the time it was popular, and frankly the whole story about a bunch of people trapped on an island just didn't appeal to me anyway), I can't reference it.

But what I can say is that this series is incredibly trope-laden (one of the main characters is named JULIA!) and that there is nothing original about it.

The cast also reflect the exact same "correctness" you see in the past few years of streaming productions (and this is true of Apple+ shows as well) where there are women running major aspects of harsh post-apocalyptic society that you would not even expect them to run in plain old 2023, and possessing all sorts of superhuman upper body strength you would simply not expect them to have.

You look at the 10,000 people who live in this society and wonder how they were chosen to be the saviors of the human race if they are the only ones left. The answer, of course, is that some sort of "central casting" selected them to be down there. Not natural selection, and not privilege, and not merit, either. It just looks random as hell, kind of like the "Belters" from The Expanse, but there it made sense because they were at least hardscrabble refugees from an authoritarian Earth government. Why save 10,000 people and stuff them in a silo if they are mostly going to be mindless worker bees. You don't get civilization that way.

That being said, the bigger problem is the believability of the world-building we are looking at.
These people have tons of luxuries. They have nice cafes and restaurants. They have computers that work, endless battery-powered objects, and a gigantic generator powered by steam but NOBODY KNOWS WHERE THE STEAM COMES FROM. They have a technology which is sophisticated enough to visually deceive the entire populace via image manipulation. They have well-run hospitals and hi-tech contraceptives. There is also a world outside which is supposedly poisonous, but somehow they can't build a workable biohazard suit or a traveling vehicle to go out and explore it. At least they did that in The Last of Us.

There are incredibly competent and heroic engineers (that's one of the best aspects of the series so far, as well as the incredible performance by engineer heroine Rebecca Ferguson) but no scientists? Nobody is trying to research anything, to discover anything? Is the steam geothermal?

Inside, there is a world where nobody questions anything. The sheriff sees a conspiracy and blatant lies in front of his eyes and literally glosses over it, believing the integrity of the totalitarian system over his own wife. Also...all religions just disappeared to be replaced by "The Founders"?

The soundtrack Maskripper mentioned? Also very tropey. The music is extremely manipulative in its emotional hooks, like it was made in a damn dark electronic music factory with lots of input from someone who listened to a lot of Sigur Ros 20 years ago. I think composers of TV shows like this have often painted themselves into a corner these days. But that's just a minor quibble compared to all the other issues.

I'm going to keep watching - why not? - but there's going to have to be something truly magnificent for me to be impressed.
Remember when I made a thread about the overwhelming trend of eco-disaster flicks? This fits right in there, as well as with general scenarios of dystopia, apocalypse, and totalitarian control.

There's so much of this kind of theme in modern sci-fi (and so little actually hopefuleness) that one has to wonder...has it just been the zeitgeist this whole time making everyone write the same kind of gloomy stories, or are there super-rich conspirators far in the background somewhere funding entertainment that makes us all feel miserable so they can keep us endlessly worrying about the future and perfectly willing to surrender individual rights to remain under their safe control?

Maybe *that's* the real dystopian tale which should be written!
Last edited by shevek 3 years ago, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Mr. X
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 5101
Joined: 14 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Are series based on mystery boxes good or has Lost kind of worn that out?
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

I jumped back in the saddle and caught up over the last two days on Silo Season 2 (2024) up to the newest episode 7.
I was mainly interested more in Juliette's adventures exploring the empty Silo 17 that I was with the political machinations and rebellion
in the main story.

Did anyone at all notice how politically correct every single one of the foregrounded romantic relationships in the Silo are?
Also they apparently snuck in a little anarcho-communist adage about the "nine meals" separating any individual from committing a crime to obtain food.

Anyway, is anyone else enjoying this series? It's claustrophobic and rather slow-going, but it has its moments. Must be pretty popular since they've already renewed it for Seasons 3 and 4.
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Episode 8 had Juliette in some peril in Silo 17. First she had the bends after a dive and was in some excruciating pain. Then she gets shot in the clavicle with a arrow by a mysterious raider in that Silo. Then she gets into an intense physical fight with one of the raiders, but manages to tear the raider's mask off to reveal that the raider is a young woman. It's entertaining to see Juliette in her struggles and battles.

Not so much the rest of the intrigue back in Silo 18. I've noticed that the casting falls into a very predictable pattern.

- As I've mentioned in the previous post, every romantic relationship follows a politically correct formula. Watch the show if you want to find out what I mean.

- There are pretty much at this point established bad people and good people. The bad ones are all toxic men, driven a bit mad with whatever little power they can wield lording it over 10,000 other people. The good people are all women: somehow, they all have forward-thinking compassionate motives and have self-sacrificing impulses to rescue and save everyone, to 'resist' oppression, and to think about the world in terms of utopia (i.e. the wonderful greenery of the 'Before Times') instead of what actually is.

Mlod (from your comment 1 year ago), since you read the Wool book, was it set up like that in the book, too?

For me, right now, the most annoying plot is the insistence by old pigtailed lesbian Martha Walker (the tacit head of the 'Mechanicals' who fix things in the Silo) upon rescuing her sick and debilitated old flame, Carla. It was clearly stated that the two were married something like 25 years ago but they hadn't talked or related to each other much after that time. So why would Walker suddenly realize that she still loves Carla and become obsessed with rescuing her to the exclusion of all else (including the Mechanicals' various plans to actually launch a resistance)? That just seems overblown and overemphasized for the purpose of making a crone seem valiant.

Anyway, I'm still slogging through Season 2 and would welcome anyone else's opinions on the series.
User avatar
Femina
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 1610
Joined: 16 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

shevek wrote:
1 year ago
Episode 8 had Juliette in some peril in Silo 17. First she had the bends after a dive and was in some excruciating pain. Then she gets shot in the clavicle with a arrow by a mysterious raider in that Silo. Then she gets into an intense physical fight with one of the raiders, but manages to tear the raider's mask off to reveal that the raider is a young woman. It's entertaining to see Juliette in her struggles and battles.

Not so much the rest of the intrigue back in Silo 18. I've noticed that the casting falls into a very predictable pattern.

- As I've mentioned in the previous post, every romantic relationship follows a politically correct formula. Watch the show if you want to find out what I mean.
There's no such thing as a politically correct relationship formula. Trans/homesexual/etc. folks don't secretly despise straight white relationships. If there exists such a qualifier, it exists on a very extraneous branch of psychos lists on the far far left and right. Don't let the weirdos corrupt your idea of how people perceive your straight cis relationships. You love who you love, nobody who matters resents you for it.
- There are pretty much at this point established bad people and good people. The bad ones are all toxic men, driven a bit mad with whatever little power they can wield lording it over 10,000 other people. The good people are all women: somehow, they all have forward-thinking compassionate motives and have self-sacrificing impulses to rescue and save everyone, to 'resist' oppression, and to think about the world in terms of utopia (i.e. the wonderful greenery of the 'Before Times') instead of what actually is.

Mlod (from your comment 1 year ago), since you read the Wool book, was it set up like that in the book, too?
I hard disagree on this. I was TERRIFIED in season 1 that it was gonna wind up that the outside was perfectly fine so the bad guys were evil... but it's not. The fact that the outside IS f'ked, reframes EVERYTHING the 'villain' has to do, with his awareness that people rebel in patterns that each represent an actual EXTINCTION level threat of opening the Silo, this reality makes him NOT the 'villain' but the actual honest to god hero from his perspective of the story.

Silo is a tale blessedly freed from the paltry examination of 'good vs evil' and exists entirely on a microcosm of society that MUST do things a very specific way just to SURVIVE because even if a better way exists, too much can go wrong experimenting with another way. The people in power and authority are CAPABLE of doing horrible things to protect the Silo, but it's always ALWAYS from a perspective in which they are CONSTANTLY forced to examine the trolly problem. If there is an actual factual 'villain' it's the BLACK family whose motivations seem solely oriented at rising in society and forcing society to make hard decisions as repercussions of their senseless jockeying for influence, not the put upon elderly white man whose actions are entirely devoted toward protecting humanity from factual extinction. I think that thus far, Silo has done a spectacular job of characterizing it's main players.

Everyone else, heroic or traditionally 'villainous' are all operating from a space of uninformed ignorance. Even Juliette's arc, the real heroine of the story, currently is that she needs to go BACK, and fix the mistake she made being to proud to clean the window... because she's only just now properly understanding the position that the leaders of the Silo are actually in, and it took being forced to walk through a sea of long dead corpses for her to realize this. That sea of corpses is what our 'villain' fears will happen to his Silo. There's very little wrong or 'evil' he can actually undertake that isn't counterbalanced by his strong desire to keep as many human beings alive as he possibly can to prevent the people of the Silo he's responsible for from becoming another sea of corpses just like that one.
For me, right now, the most annoying plot is the insistence by old pigtailed lesbian Martha Walker (the tacit head of the 'Mechanicals' who fix things in the Silo) upon rescuing her sick and debilitated old flame, Carla. It was clearly stated that the two were married something like 25 years ago but they hadn't talked or related to each other much after that time. So why would Walker suddenly realize that she still loves Carla and become obsessed with rescuing her to the exclusion of all else (including the Mechanicals' various plans to actually launch a resistance)? That just seems overblown and overemphasized for the purpose of making a crone seem valiant.

Anyway, I'm still slogging through Season 2 and would welcome anyone else's opinions on the series.
This is my least favorite arc as well. Especially as it requires a character who was sly and cunning in season 1 to devolve into an idiot just to facilitate the plot. It's also just like... if you're SO invested in her safety to the point of making a dumb decision like this... why did you let her sacrifice herself to begin with?

It's okay though, every show has a loose dumb plot thread or two, Silo is otherwise a fairly excellently paced and thought through series. Some elements were always going to require some suspension of disbelief (I find it impossible to believe that engineers wouldn't be basically exactly as important as IT in the 'hierarchy' of command... how you can possibly hope for your underground society to exist when the BOTTOM class of citizen has absolute control over the literal beating heart of the WORLD and could terminate that heart at any given moment? Logic dictates that the people in control of the core... are in control of the WORLD... But it's a trick of storytelling we can let slide for what is otherwise, a pretty firmly grounded presentation of the concept)
User avatar
Mr. X
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 5101
Joined: 14 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Femina wrote:
1 year ago

There's no such thing as a politically correct relationship formula. Trans/homesexual/etc. folks don't secretly despise straight white relationships. If there exists such a qualifier, it exists on a very extraneous branch of psychos lists on the far far left and right. Don't let the weirdos corrupt your idea of how people perceive your straight cis relationships. You love who you love, nobody who matters resents you for it.
Yes there are and we dealt with that for decades from the 1950s to the 1980s. Its just the "politically correct" were the conservatives and it was the white straight family archtype. In fact nearly all progressive media did whatever they could to smash that formula to replace it with their own.
User avatar
Femina
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 1610
Joined: 16 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Mr. X wrote:
1 year ago
Femina wrote:
1 year ago

There's no such thing as a politically correct relationship formula. Trans/homesexual/etc. folks don't secretly despise straight white relationships. If there exists such a qualifier, it exists on a very extraneous branch of psychos lists on the far far left and right. Don't let the weirdos corrupt your idea of how people perceive your straight cis relationships. You love who you love, nobody who matters resents you for it.
Yes there are and we dealt with that for decades from the 1950s to the 1980s. Its just the "politically correct" were the conservatives and it was the white straight family archtype. In fact nearly all progressive media did whatever they could to smash that formula to replace it with their own.
As I said.
Don't let the weirdos corrupt your idea of how people perceive your straight cis relationships. You love who you love, nobody who matters resents you for it.
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Femina-

I've sent you a list of the aforementioned relationships in Silo in a private message.
Read that list before you respond further. Thank you.
User avatar
Femina
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 1610
Joined: 16 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

shevek wrote:
1 year ago
Femina-

I've sent you a list of the aforementioned relationships in Silo in a private message.
Read that list before you respond further. Thank you.
You're laboring under a idea that I am swayable by a presentation of primarily interracial relationships as 'PC' relationships vs standard white man and woman relationships or any other which intentionally or not presents an implication that there exists a frame of argument or political rallying cry AGAINST any relationship pairing as a median. To which I'd argue the only real pairing that still retains inflamatory bias against it are homosexual pairings... few of whom would themselves be bandying about arguments that only 'straight white pairings are PC boo hoo!' I assure you, AS A BISEXUAL, that I whole heartedly endorse white men and white women to love the absolute fuck out of each other. NO love is wrong. There is no such thing as a PC relationship... and I hope you don't spend too much time muddying about with this concept or this paragraph since it's got the least to do with the show we're discussing and I believe we discussed it in the "DM's."

More to the point of valuable discourse about this how I think you FORGOT a very important relationship in the list of names you sent me, one that permeates the entirety of the story deeper than any other (though admittedly could have afforded a little more screen time). Juliette and George. The man whose death Juliette breaks the world for. The only argument to be made that her relationship isn't 'PC' enough exists if this relationship is portrayed as lesser than the others or wrong. It isn't. It's the love she had for him, unjustly ripped away from her, that set her on the path that is leading the Silo towards it's confiscatory fate. You probably forgot this pairing because it's from season 1... but it's the relationship that remains the single most important in the DNA of the show even now, because George's death is still the preliminary cause of the Silo's seemingly inevitable doom.

All the rest of it as it seems to me is that the Silo is a civilization packaged up with no thought at all put into a consideration of homogenizing Silos with people's of a monolithic race. One might consider this realistic or unrealistic in accordance with their own beliefs... but I feel we can extend the show some leniency on this notion, I am afterall, already giving it an enormous amount of leniency on the idea that the Silo's lowest 'class' of citizen is allowed to have ABSOLUTE CONTROL over the Silo's core, which is far more unbelievable than that the Silo's would be packaged with an eye for racial diversity and thus includes a myriad of diverse relationships.

I'll let the matter go now in the hopes this topic manages to entice an audience that might lead them to what I consider to be a truly excellent television series... because it's one of the best out there atm.
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

You're right, I did forget about Juliette and George because they were way back in the beginning of Season 1.
All the relationships I sent you on the list were current. Anyway consider the matter let go.

But as far as your incredulity about the mechanicals at the bottom of the Silo controlling the core of the society, how could it be otherwise?
Who else is going to have final say about the power being generated, other than those who actually generate the power?
It's easy to explain why they put so much power in the hands of the mechanicals: the founders wrote The Pact to cover all of those rules.
The only way that the society works is if everyone abides by the rules in The Pact. If they don't, it collapses.
User avatar
Femina
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 1610
Joined: 16 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

shevek wrote:
1 year ago
But as far as your incredulity about the mechanicals at the bottom of the Silo controlling the core of the society, how could it be otherwise?
Who else is going to have final say about the power being generated, other than those who actually generate the power?
It's easy to explain why they put so much power in the hands of the mechanicals: the founders wrote The Pact to cover all of those rules.
The only way that the society works is if everyone abides by the rules in The Pact. If they don't, it collapses.
I mean it's incredulous that the engineers would be the lowest class of citizen when they are actually the people most responsible for existence to even be possible. IT is sort of the 'god emperor' of the Silo (Metaphorically speaking) regardless of the 'professed' societal structure of the Silo... but as the Silo is essentially a microcosm of an entire WORLD... and there's only one group of people who control the core (aka the literal beating heart of that world) THOSE people would have to be the only ones who could realistically rise in power to become the 'god emperors' and wouldn't be the bum hole of the social hierarchy as they are in the show. The story simply is choosing to rely on what feels 'true' to us viewers relevant to how jobs and societies structure works on our planet, but it's not a true representation of how society would HAVE to work in a fully realized depiction of a Silo society. The truest concept of Silo society would be one where the people at the BOTTOM are in charge, because at any moment they hold the power to end civilization as we know it at the flip of a switch. There's no realistic power structure imaginable that can hope to have the kind of authoritarian stranglehold over the Silo as the show's leaders are depicted having WITHOUT also having total control over the core themselves. In this sense, we have to allow that the show is at least marginally 'metaphorical' similar perhaps in how you can't actually watch 'Snowpiercer' and take it at face value.
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Femina wrote:
1 year ago

I mean it's incredulous that the engineers would be the lowest class of citizen when they are actually the people most responsible for existence to even be possible. IT is sort of the 'god emperor' of the Silo (Metaphorically speaking) regardless of the 'professed' societal structure of the Silo... but as the Silo is essentially a microcosm of an entire WORLD... and there's only one group of people who control the core (aka the literal beating heart of that world) THOSE people would have to be the only ones who could realistically rise in power to become the 'god emperors' and wouldn't be the bum hole of the social hierarchy as they are in the show. The story simply is choosing to rely on what feels 'true' to us viewers relevant to how jobs and societies structure works on our planet, but it's not a true representation of how society would HAVE to work in a fully realized depiction of a Silo society. The truest concept of Silo society would be one where the people at the BOTTOM are in charge, because at any moment they hold the power to end civilization as we know it at the flip of a switch. There's no realistic power structure imaginable that can hope to have the kind of authoritarian stranglehold over the Silo as the show's leaders are depicted having WITHOUT also having total control over the core themselves. In this sense, we have to allow that the show is at least marginally 'metaphorical' similar perhaps in how you can't actually watch 'Snowpiercer' and take it at face value.
I'm going to have to disagree. I think in considering the role of the mechanicals so much, you're drastically under-emphasizing the importance of the Pact in this world. The Pact is referred to *constantly* in the story in both Seasons 1 and 2.
It is essentially a political text which attains religious importance in the population's adhesion to its strictures, like Chairman Mao's little red book.
In fact, the Silo is pretty similar to Maoist China (except for the diversity casting) in that you would *think* that the specialized workers (whose skills cannot easily be replaced or replicated) would have all the power (because that, in fact, is what Communism preaches) and yet it is the Party Apparatchiks at the top who control everything, scheming and intriguing amongst themselves as they jockey for power, all the while constantly citing chapter and verse from their little red book to keep the populace in line.
User avatar
Femina
Millenium Member
Millenium Member
Posts: 1610
Joined: 16 years ago
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

shevek wrote:
1 year ago
Femina wrote:
1 year ago

I mean it's incredulous that the engineers would be the lowest class of citizen when they are actually the people most responsible for existence to even be possible. IT is sort of the 'god emperor' of the Silo (Metaphorically speaking) regardless of the 'professed' societal structure of the Silo... but as the Silo is essentially a microcosm of an entire WORLD... and there's only one group of people who control the core (aka the literal beating heart of that world) THOSE people would have to be the only ones who could realistically rise in power to become the 'god emperors' and wouldn't be the bum hole of the social hierarchy as they are in the show. The story simply is choosing to rely on what feels 'true' to us viewers relevant to how jobs and societies structure works on our planet, but it's not a true representation of how society would HAVE to work in a fully realized depiction of a Silo society. The truest concept of Silo society would be one where the people at the BOTTOM are in charge, because at any moment they hold the power to end civilization as we know it at the flip of a switch. There's no realistic power structure imaginable that can hope to have the kind of authoritarian stranglehold over the Silo as the show's leaders are depicted having WITHOUT also having total control over the core themselves. In this sense, we have to allow that the show is at least marginally 'metaphorical' similar perhaps in how you can't actually watch 'Snowpiercer' and take it at face value.
I'm going to have to disagree. I think in considering the role of the mechanicals so much, you're drastically under-emphasizing the importance of the Pact in this world. The Pact is referred to *constantly* in the story in both Seasons 1 and 2.
It is essentially a political text which attains religious importance in the population's adhesion to its strictures, like Chairman Mao's little red book.
In fact, the Silo is pretty similar to Maoist China (except for the diversity casting) in that you would *think* that the specialized workers (whose skills cannot easily be replaced or replicated) would have all the power (because that, in fact, is what Communism preaches) and yet it is the Party Apparatchiks at the top who control everything, scheming and intriguing amongst themselves as they jockey for power, all the while constantly citing chapter and verse from their little red book to keep the populace in line.
My thinking is that the Pact would, realistically, necessitate that Engineers be treated as a venerated class of citizen for it to ever have had any chance or hope of actually succeeding. I mean consider that the pact ALREADY venerates IT the way it does in a 'secritive' sense, making IT the real shadow overlords... but why IT and not Engineers? I mean don't get me wrong, IT is important... but not as important as the Core, which if it stops spinning means everyone dies. Most of my theories about the show have the pact existing as meticulously and all encompassing as it does specifically to prevent a situation in which the vault door is EVER opened before the world is somehow made save to live in. I DON'T in any way think ANYTHING about the pact is power mongering or maliciously authoritarian. I think that conceptually to the show, the pact exists as it does because an enormous think tank of the most brilliant minds of a dying earth tried to set up an outline method to house the last of humanity in these Silo's... and tried to imagine any sorts of trials and tribulations, be they external incursions, psychological phenomena etc. that would threaten humanity... and that yes, most of the problems that result in everyone dead are just eventualities that no amount of foresight could ever have prevented.. but in NO situation that I consider the universe set up the way it is, can I fathom a pact that would realistically ignore the IMPERATIVE that the core never. ever. EVER. stop running, so for this reason I have to suspend my disbelief that the Silo wouldn't venerate it's engineers.

Now we could always find down the line that the pact is all BS and meant orchestrated to give power to a certain class over others just 'cause'... or that IT somehow SEIZED control over Engineering and that's one of the things that's been lost and IT's just covering it up... but I would be devastated to see the show fall to such banal nonsense after doing things so well for so long... in which case it would all make sense... but in the Siloverse as it's currently set up, taking the show in as smart and believable a way as it's generally been running, it will always feel to me that they've sacrificed a smidge of realism for the metaphor to better resonate with people's every day livelihood.
User avatar
shevek
Producer
Producer
Posts: 4377
Joined: 13 years ago
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: Silo [TV show, 2023, Apple+]

Femina wrote:
1 year ago
shevek wrote:
1 year ago
Femina wrote:
1 year ago

I mean it's incredulous that the engineers would be the lowest class of citizen when they are actually the people most responsible for existence to even be possible. IT is sort of the 'god emperor' of the Silo (Metaphorically speaking) regardless of the 'professed' societal structure of the Silo... but as the Silo is essentially a microcosm of an entire WORLD... and there's only one group of people who control the core (aka the literal beating heart of that world) THOSE people would have to be the only ones who could realistically rise in power to become the 'god emperors' and wouldn't be the bum hole of the social hierarchy as they are in the show. The story simply is choosing to rely on what feels 'true' to us viewers relevant to how jobs and societies structure works on our planet, but it's not a true representation of how society would HAVE to work in a fully realized depiction of a Silo society. The truest concept of Silo society would be one where the people at the BOTTOM are in charge, because at any moment they hold the power to end civilization as we know it at the flip of a switch. There's no realistic power structure imaginable that can hope to have the kind of authoritarian stranglehold over the Silo as the show's leaders are depicted having WITHOUT also having total control over the core themselves. In this sense, we have to allow that the show is at least marginally 'metaphorical' similar perhaps in how you can't actually watch 'Snowpiercer' and take it at face value.
I'm going to have to disagree. I think in considering the role of the mechanicals so much, you're drastically under-emphasizing the importance of the Pact in this world. The Pact is referred to *constantly* in the story in both Seasons 1 and 2.
It is essentially a political text which attains religious importance in the population's adhesion to its strictures, like Chairman Mao's little red book.
In fact, the Silo is pretty similar to Maoist China (except for the diversity casting) in that you would *think* that the specialized workers (whose skills cannot easily be replaced or replicated) would have all the power (because that, in fact, is what Communism preaches) and yet it is the Party Apparatchiks at the top who control everything, scheming and intriguing amongst themselves as they jockey for power, all the while constantly citing chapter and verse from their little red book to keep the populace in line.
My thinking is that the Pact would, realistically, necessitate that Engineers be treated as a venerated class of citizen for it to ever have had any chance or hope of actually succeeding. I mean consider that the pact ALREADY venerates IT the way it does in a 'secritive' sense, making IT the real shadow overlords... but why IT and not Engineers? I mean don't get me wrong, IT is important... but not as important as the Core, which if it stops spinning means everyone dies. Most of my theories about the show have the pact existing as meticulously and all encompassing as it does specifically to prevent a situation in which the vault door is EVER opened before the world is somehow made save to live in. I DON'T in any way think ANYTHING about the pact is power mongering or maliciously authoritarian. I think that conceptually to the show, the pact exists as it does because an enormous think tank of the most brilliant minds of a dying earth tried to set up an outline method to house the last of humanity in these Silo's... and tried to imagine any sorts of trials and tribulations, be they external incursions, psychological phenomena etc. that would threaten humanity... and that yes, most of the problems that result in everyone dead are just eventualities that no amount of foresight could ever have prevented.. but in NO situation that I consider the universe set up the way it is, can I fathom a pact that would realistically ignore the IMPERATIVE that the core never. ever. EVER. stop running, so for this reason I have to suspend my disbelief that the Silo wouldn't venerate it's engineers.

Now we could always find down the line that the pact is all BS and meant orchestrated to give power to a certain class over others just 'cause'... or that IT somehow SEIZED control over Engineering and that's one of the things that's been lost and IT's just covering it up... but I would be devastated to see the show fall to such banal nonsense after doing things so well for so long... in which case it would all make sense... but in the Siloverse as it's currently set up, taking the show in as smart and believable a way as it's generally been running, it will always feel to me that they've sacrificed a smidge of realism for the metaphor to better resonate with people's every day livelihood.
Understood, but I'm not sure you got the sense of what I meant when I was talking about The Pact.
I don't think the Pact is prioritizing one class over another - for example, IT over Engineer.
Again, I think the Pact is very similar to, and perhaps patterned after, the Little Red Book and its aphorisms.
The purpose and intent of Maoism and Communism was to create a great Levelling (in fact, that's what the philosophy was originally called in England before Marx: the Levellers) where all the specialized industrial and agricultural classes were essentially regarded as equal contributors to the nation, and where the elected 'chairmen' were of the people and for the people.

That was the purpose. The practice is very different in the sense that real Communism cannot actually exist on a large scale, not even on a scale of a society of 10,000 people. I doubt there was any kibbutz or kolkhoz that was even that big?. (The only exception has been Rojava, and we've seen that precious experiment is only as strong as the invading Turkish army who could wipe it out within a few months.)

What actually happens is that you get a class of bureaucrats at the top who accrue power and are then entrenched, and then they begin to squabble amongst themselves rather than act as one for the good of the community.
The principles of The Pact try to prevent this from happening, but they really can't.

So what you wind up with, almost no matter what, is a situation where the IT apparatchiks at the top lord over the mechanical workers at the bottom. Theoretically, the mechanicals could then go on strike if their rights aren't respected, but in reality what happens is that the bureaucrats send down a repressive army (the Raiders) to force them back in line.

None of what you see in Silo is reinventing the wheel in any way whatsoever - the plot replicates what happens when you implement a system which on its surface seems egalitarian and mutually beneficial but in practice becomes authoritarian and oppressive because of human nature.

On another note, why doesn't the Silo have freight elevators? If its architects can design a spiral staircase which winds around a central shaft for more than 100 levels, then why isn't there simply a lever-and-pulley system in the middle of that shaft?
Post Reply